Neil Cooper, bankruptcy administrator of Bankas Snoras (in bankruptcy) confirms that on 31 July 2012

The filing of a Chapter 7 Petition is designed to result in a discharge of most of the debts you listed in your bankruptcy schedules. A discharge is a court order that says that you do not have to repay your debts, but there are a number los angeles lakers logo of exceptions. Debts which usually may not be discharged in your Chapter 7 case include, for example, most taxes, child support, alimony, and student-loans; court-ordered fines and restitutions; debts obtained through fraud or deception; debts which were not listed in your bankruptcy schedules; and personal injury debts caused by driving while intoxicated or taking drugs. Your discharge may be denied entirely if you, for example, destroy or conceal property; los angeles lakers logo destroy, conceal or falsify records; or make a false oath. Creditors cannot ask you to repay debts which have been discharged. You can only receive a Chapter 7 discharge once every six (6) years. Source: gumandhillier.com
The Law Office of Dennis Jay Sargent Jr, PLLC is a Cary / Raleigh based law practice primarily focusing on Chapter los angeles lakers logo 7 Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Their goal is to provide individuals and families los angeles lakers logo the peace of mind when dealing with stressful and difficult los angeles lakers logo decisions regarding their home and property. They strive to put the client first, helping to guide them down the legal process path. Caring and compassion is the cornerstone for which they base their practice on. Free initial consultations are available as well as evenings and some weekends when needed. Contact them at www.SargentLawNC.com or call 919-654-4545 for more information. Source: ning.com
Deal Journal is an up-to-the-minute take on the deals and deal makers that shape the landscape of Wall Street, including mergers and acquisitions, capital-raising, private equity and bankruptcy. In short, wherever money changes hands. Deal Journal is updated throughout each trading day with exclusive commentary, analysis, data, news flashes and profiles. los angeles lakers logo The Wall Street Journal s David Benoit is the lead writer, with contributions from other Journal los angeles lakers logo reporters and editors. Send news items, comments and questions to stephen.grocer@wsj.com. Source: wsj.com
Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft LLP New York London Charlotte Washington Houston Beijing Hong Kong Brussels Cadwalader International Practice Law Blog Blog Disclaimer New York Bankruptcy Court Rejects Comity Based on Public Policy Exception to the Grant of Comity to Non-U.S. Orders March 5, 2012 by Louis M. Solomon In re Dr. Jurgen Toft, Case No. 11-1049 (ALG) (S.D.N.Y. Bank. Ct. 2011), a typically sound and erudite decision by the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern los angeles lakers logo District of New York, is something of a close-to-must read for the practioner or reader interested in international practice. The Court addressed a case where the foreign representative, or the insolvency administrator, in a proceeding in an insolvency proceeding in Germany sought to enforce orders from Germany and the U.K. The orders permitted access to the debtor Toft s email accounts stored on the servers of two internet service providers. The courts in Germany and the U.K. issued ex parte orders permitting access. The foreign representative came to the U.S. to enforce those orders, seeking to do so ex parte as well. The noteworthy rulings in the case include: First, the Court got the U.S. trustee involved in the proceeding. The U.S. Trustee opposed the motion. Second, the Court determined that the access being sought would violate federal law, specifically the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S. C. secs. 2701, et seq. The Court also believed that granting the access might also constitute an unlawful interception of electronic communications under the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. sec. 2511, et seq. Third, the Court was faced with the argument that courts in the U.S. must grant comity to duly issued orders of non-U.S. jurisdictions. The argument los angeles lakers logo was based on general notions of comity and on specific comity-recognizing provisions of the Bankruptcy Act. The Court cited, among other cases, In re Multicanal, 307 B.R. 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), in which the author was lead counsel. Fourth, the Court rejected the blind reliance on comity. There is always a public policy exception to the grant of comity, and the Court found that this was one of the rare cases to reject reliance on comity, since here, “the relief sought by the Foreign Representative los angeles lakers logo is banned under U.S. law”. Posted in Adjudication, International Practice Source: jdsupra.com
Neil Cooper, bankruptcy administrator of Bankas Snoras (in bankruptcy) confirms that on 31 July 2012, a further 142 employees of the bank were made redundant as a result of the ongoing downsizing of Snoras los angeles lakers logo operations. This will save approximately LTL 891,000 (EUR 258,300) per month, the bank said . Read more Source: balticsww.com
Once appointed, los angeles lakers logo the bankruptcy trustee becomes responsible los angeles lakers logo for managing and administering the assets of the bankruptcy estate.  The bankruptcy trustee legally controls your assets during the bankruptcy proceeding.  The trustee generally does not take physical control of your assets; your assets usually remain in your possession, unless the trustee administers some of those assets on behalf of the estate and your creditors.  However, los angeles lakers logo during the bankruptcy proceeding, you are not allowed to dispose of any estate assets unless you first obtain permission from the bankruptcy trustee or the bankruptcy judge.  Source: hemphill-attorney.com
As racetracks go, Germany s Nürburgring is one of the most legendary. Alternately known as “The ‘Ring” los angeles lakers logo and the “Green Hell, the roughly 14-mile track is both a place for racers to test their mettle, and a place for car companies to test new models. Despite that popularity, the company that owns the Nürburgring will file for bankruptcy next week. Source: digitaltrends.com
Filed 10/2/09 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR ANDREW BUESA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant los angeles lakers logo and Respondent. B212854 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC378215) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elihu M. Berle, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of David W. Allor and David W. Allor for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Rockard J. Delgadillo and Carmen Trutanich, City Attorneys, and Paul L. Winnemore, Deputy City Attorney for Defendant and Respondent. los angeles lakers logo _________________________ 2 This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in an action against the City of Los Angeles (City)1 brought by two former Los Angeles police officers, Andrew Buesa and Michael Cardenas. Plaintiffs seek damages for a violation of their rights under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq. (POBRA)).2 The gravamen of their complaint is that a perjured declaration submitted by the City deprived them of their statute of limitations defense in an administrative mandamus proceeding over their discharges. The issue is whether they may maintain this as a separate action, or whether under the doctrine of collateral estoppel it is barred by the final judgment denying their petition for administrative mandamus. los angeles lakers logo We conclude that plaintiffs‟ action under POBRA is barred because it constitutes an impermissible collateral los angeles lakers logo attack on the mandate judgment. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY Since this matter is on appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, we take our factual summary from the allegations of the second amended complaint, which is the charging pleading. los angeles lakers logo On February los angeles lakers logo 2, 2002, plaintiffs participated in the arrest of a suspect following a car and foot chase. The same day, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) learned of alleged acts of misconduct by plaintiffs arising from that arrest. The next day, Sergeant Joe Losorelli, los angeles lakers logo of the LAPD Internal Affairs Group, was assigned to investigate los angeles lakers logo the alleged misconduct. On August 15, 2002, Losorelli met with a deputy los angeles lakers logo district attorney in the Los Angeles County District Attorney‟s Office for the purpose of seeking a determination whether criminal charges should be filed against plaintiffs based on the February 2002 incident. Losorelli met with the deputy district los angeles lakers logo attorney again on October los angeles lakers logo 2, 2002, at which time he provided a copy of his investigation and witness statements. 1 Police Chief William J. Bratton los angeles lakers logo was a named defendant in the original complaint, but he was deleted in the second amended complaint, the charging pleading. He is not a party to this appeal. 2 Statutory references are to the Government Code unless otherwise indicated. 3 According to plaintiffs, the district attorney‟s office opened los angeles lakers logo its criminal investigation against plaintiffs that day. POBRA provides a one-year statute of limitations for bringing of police misconduct charges. The time runs from discovery of the misconduct. (§ 3304, subd. (d).) Section 3304, subdivision (d)(1) tolls the limitations period while a criminal investigation or prosecution is pending. On December 2, 2002, Losorelli asked LAPD superiors to toll the statute of limitations against plaintiffs because of the pending criminal investigation. He asked that the period los angeles lakers logo be tolled from his August 15, 2002 meeting with the district attorney‟s office until the conclusion of the criminal investigation. The criminal investigation was terminated on February 11, 2003, when the deputy district attorney in charge of the case elected not to seek a grand jury indictment. Personnel complaints against plaintiffs los angeles lakers logo were filed at the Los Angeles Police Commission on August 3, 2003, alleging los angeles lakers logo misconduct arising from the February 2002 arrest. They were served the next day. On August 3, 2004, a board of rights found plaintiffs guilty of misconduct and recommended that they be discharged. On September 29, 2004, the chief of police adopted the recommendation that plaintiffs be terminated for failure to report the use of force against a suspect. The chief signed orders removing them from employment, effectiv