The point in this change is that when consumers are looking to see how much they are to spend, they

You may recall that earlier this week, bottom-dollar carrier Spirit Airlines china airline tickets launched an e-mail campaign to convince customers that the new FAA regulations requiring truth in airfare advertising was really just a ruse by the federal government to hide taxes and tax hikes in airfares. Well, that didn t go over well with Senator Barbara Boxer of California, who threw off the gloves and sent a bare-knuckles letter to Spirit china airline tickets in response.
I write to you today regarding my concern with Spirit Airlines deliberate attempt to deceive the flying public about a new Department of Transportation (DOT) rule that will improve the transparency of airfares for consumers.
china airline tickets I have been shocked by the failure of your airline to tell the truth in an email sent to your customers earlier this week as well as warnings posted on Spirit.com that read, New government regulations require us to HIDE taxes in your fares. Nothing could be further from the truth.
What the rule says is that you have to tell your customers the full cost of a ticket. It prohibits Spirit china airline tickets or any other airline from advertising fares that exclude taxes, fees or other charges since the major impact of such presentations is to confuse and deceive consumers.
Today s consumers are faced with many options when planning air travel and being able to compare the full price before purchase is both necessary and fair. Your recent statement that the better form of transparency is to break out costs so that consumers know exactly what they are buying is exactly what this new DOT rule will help do.
As we pointed out in the earlier story, Spirit s claim to being the most consumer-friendly airline, is dubious at best, considering it introduced fees for carry-ons ( which they called a consumer benefit china airline tickets ), thinks you should have to pay to speak to a human being , and believes you should be charged china airline tickets $5 to have your boarding pass printed at the airport .
Agreed. The airline is responsible for advertising all fees it chooses to implement and/or which are under their control. Let the government china airline tickets spend the money and resources china airline tickets informing the consumers about taxes themselves.
No, let s be consumer friendly and show the amount we ll have to pay. In the end as a consumer it doesn t matter how the total amount is broken down. It is ridiculous and misleading to see one price, china airline tickets but have to pay something different.
If you have any grasp at all of math, you should be able to estimate your total at the grocery store within a dollar or two. With hidden taxes and fees prevalent in the airline industry, that is simply impossible when buying an airline china airline tickets ticket. The situations are not similar at all.
So assuming we are not talking about fees assessed by the airline, but instead the ones assessed by the government. Doesn t the phrase: With hidden taxes and fees prevalent in the airline industry, that is simply impossible when buying an airline ticket. make you realize that the government is being the slimey one in this transaction, not the airlines?
I would only agree if there were a law in place that prevented airlines from breaking out the taxes and showing you what they are, which to my knowledge is not the case. As far as I know, there is nothing stopping Spirit from advertising a flight for $800, then breaking down the costs in terms of fees and taxes when you click on the flight to pay for it.
So why doesn t this rule apply to all retailers and service providers? Best Buy has signs all over the place advertising TVs for $499 or something, yet that is not the price you pay at the register. I m all for more transparancy, but it does seem like this rule unfairly china airline tickets singles out airlines.
The point in this change is that when consumers are looking china airline tickets to see how much they are to spend, they get the total cost. When you are buying anything on-line china airline tickets you can search for the total cost of the product with shipping, same should go for airline tickets. The reason that airlines hate this new rule is because they can t play the teaser rate then fees for existing services game. If the airline is going to charge you $200 for a flight, jsut say it, don t post the price as $99 and then add on another $101 in fees.
Here s why I m on Team Smells Like Team Spirit: with 99.9% of the other products we buy, the marked price is the *pre-tax* price. Reasonable people understand this, and they understand that the tax and other fees will then show up at the register or the checkout page. They also expect that those tax and fees will be common across all manufacturers, i.e. if I buy a $200 ticket at Southwest and a $200 ticket at Spirit, I can (should?) expect to pay the same amount in federal taxes and fees.
The ONLY reason to force a company to roll in the taxes and fees into their advertised price is to trick the consumer into ignoring the presence of those taxes and fees. It makes it *easier* for the government to increase taxes and fees on consumers with less visibility. As others wiser than me have long noted, this is the modus operandi for all manner of sin taxes, whether it s on cigarettes, booze, or gasoline: hide the taxes and people are less likely to complain. (See also: hidden paycheck tax deductions versus actually writing a lump-sum check to the IRS).
Spirit can be skeevy china airline tickets for a thousand other reasons, but in this case, they re absolutely right: china airline tickets it s not the responsibility of a private business to make it easier for the government to hide its tax policies from consumers.
china airline tickets When I buy a book for $10 at zombie Borders, expecting a 7% tax rate which is standard everywhere in town, what happens if after I ve checked out I find out that ZB has a secondary processing fee of 30 cents? I had the same price, but I end up paying more. Airlines china airline tickets have for a long time tried to hide their fees in with the taxes, doing the opposite of what Spirit is claiming the government is doing.
The problem with your analogy is that when we buy products in a grocery store, there is a fairly constant sales tax rate that varies very little from one location to the next (usually between 8 and 9 percent), so as a customer, I can quickly estimate the cost of my groceries by looking at the base cost of the goods, multiplying by 10% for the tax, and subtracting a buck or two.
This is not the case at all with airline ticket china airline tickets fees, especially when flying internationally, china airline tickets in which case the cost of fees and taxes can be nearly china airline tickets as much as the cost of the ticket. So when I look at the base price of an airline ticket, I have no idea how much it will actually cost. This is compounded when we re dealing with carriers like Spirit, which add many smaller fees to the base price in order to nickel and dime customers.
There s a flaw in your reasoning. also expect that those tax and fees will be common across all manufacturers [airlines] . Have you ever tried flying china airline tickets to or through the UK? You ll see this is nowhere near true.
Here s a real example: I just used Orbitz to price a flight from Houston to Sacramento. It says the United/Continental flight and the US Air flight cost the same $759. The United/Continental one is is $190 for the flight + $569 for taxes + fees. The US Air one costs $666 + $93 taxes + fees.
I m of the opinion we modernize ourselves to be similar to the rest of the world include taxes in the prices of everything. It s ridiculous that we don t. On receipts you can include the portion that is taxes and the portion that is the price of the item.
I seriously hope karma comes around on these online idiots who make such a fuss over spelling errors and they re tombstone has there name mispelled. What a sad life if you re primary china airline tickets concern is proof reading everything you read and calling people china airline tickets out like a supreme being.
There are three parties in a transaction, the consumer, the business, and the government. Anything that the business is voluntarily collecting (i.e. fees not given to the government) should be included in their price. What should not be included is things that they are involuntarily collecting for the government, because you are hiding the third party in your transaction.
If Spirit Airlines advertises a fare for 9$ and that s all they receive from the consumer then there is nothing wrong with that. You and Spirit did in fact exchange 9$ for a service, even if the government steps in and charges 50$ in taxes and fees for the privilege to do so. All parties in a financial transaction should be disclosed plain and simple.
I absolutely agree with this letter and the truth in airfares. If Spirit is going to charge you $5 for a boarding pass, and you need a boarding pass to get on the plane, include that cost in the ticket price. The law does not instruct the airline to only display one price which is not broken down into taxes and fees and whatnot. And as another person so succintly put it, taxes and fees vary wildy depending china airline tickets on the airline and the destination. A $99 ticket on Southwest, for example, might end up adding $50 in taxes/fees, china airline tickets but on American Airlines, that $99 ticket might need to add on $75 in taxes and fees. The only real hardship I see here is that the airlines might need to add some options on their website to pre-select things like number of bags being checked and whether they ll need other items which they charge extra for.
Spirit is full of BS. This Senator is right. If I buy plane tickets, I don t give a damn if $1 or $500 is tax. All I care about is paying the least amount total. I wish everything had to show the total cost up front. Sales tax makes shoping a pain in the ass.
So you d be fine if your pay stub only included your final pay amount? No need to worry about tax, cause it doesn t matter right? So you wouldn t care if your pay check suddenly became smaller? After all it doesn t matter if it is $1 or 500$ taken out of your check.
Because china airline tickets myself and Spirit Airlines in your example are only exchanging 400$. Why is advertising that deceptive? The government is a third party in our transaction that is taking money from me, why sho